Vintage - homo -erotiek uit het verleden, deel 2
136,978 96%
9 jaar geleden
,jpeg/013/517/468/1280x720.10.jpg)
,jpeg/005/743/030/1280x720.10.jpg)
,jpeg/010/583/398/v2/320x180.246.jpg)
,jpeg/016/409/775/1280x720.9.jpg)
,jpeg/004/382/608/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/004/325/353/1280x720.4.jpg)
,jpeg/015/598/567/1280x720.6.jpg)
,jpeg/011/323/788/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/010/506/147/v2/320x180.203.jpg)
,jpeg/015/652/421/1280x720.10.jpg)
,jpeg/006/677/830/v2/320x180.207.jpg)
Reacties
9
Gelieve in te loggen of registreer om commentaar te geven.
… wow - did rules dictate that you couldn’t do so much as kiss?! … Ugh, this is so arousing .. probably because of what ISN’T portrayed.. So many beautiful bodies.. yummy asses!
Antwoorden
this video proves you don’t need to present explicit sexual activity to be arousing .. I love that this keeps you watching/ guessing .. will we be shown more!
Antwoorden
gnawinghunger 1 jaar geleden
I remember the days of posing pouches, although I wasn't interested in men at that time. The nudist magazines would have pictures of people with their genital areas just totally smooth. It looked just like a toy doll. I was so glad when the magazines started showing nude people with their genitals on display. Unfortunately, today society ISN'T as proper thinking as it was in the period of, let's say, 1966 to the late 1970's as far as nudity is concerned. SAD, SAD, SAD!!!!
Antwoorden
… a very interesting look at history.. am curious why (??) there’s no representation of any sexual activity - just hints, insinuations.
Antwoorden